Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6112 13
Original file (NR6112 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2480

BAN
Docket No. NRO6112-13
25 November 2013

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552.

BA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

22 November 2013. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by the Naval Personnel Command {NPC}
memo 1430 Ser 811/295 of 12 Sept 2013, a Copy of which was provided to
you on 24 October 2013. No response was received within a 30 day
period. Therefore, your case was presented to the Board as is.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
making this determination, the Board substantially concurred with the
comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of

the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when

applying for a correction of an official naval record,
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material

error or injustice.
Sincerely,

Executive

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4871 13

    Original file (NR4871 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6440 13

    Original file (NR6440 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted jn support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5244 13

    Original file (NR5244 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6790 13

    Original file (NR6790 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when he burden is applying for a correction of an official naval record, t on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6936 13

    Original file (NR6936 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased husband's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7850 13

    Original file (NR7850 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NROQ7850-13 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2475 13

    Original file (NR2475 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, In addition, the Board considered the regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2367 13

    Original file (NR2367 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when Docket No.NRO2367-15 applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7808 13

    Original file (NR7808 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5899 13

    Original file (NR5899 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In June 2013, your husband sought 2 correction to his naval record to show that he enrolled his spouse, Ey -: the sole beneficiary of SBP within one year of his marriage. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.